The star-cast and Imdb summary of this Bhimsain Khurana film
gave an impression of it being a film in the mould of ‘Chhoti si Baat’ or
‘Rajnigandha’. After all, one can hardly expect an Amol Palekar or a Zarina
Wahab to star in a movie that is not a feel-good entertainer. But ‘Gharonda’ is
hardly that Basu Chatterjee or a Rajshri movie from the 1970s that would leave
you smiling and cause you to drift away in a simple and endearing world where
everyone is good at heart and there are hardly any vices. It surely tells a
story of two working-class people living in an urban city (much like Chhoti si
Baat and Rajnigandha), but here the tone and tenor is drastically different.
The world out here is the big and bad one where people aren’t always sweet and
don’t always have the best of intentions. They are insecure yet ambitious,
apprehensive yet ruthless. They hardly think beyond their own interests and
seldom give a damn about the lives of others. The film tells the story of two
people in love who dream to have their own house in the concrete jungle of
Mumbai, daring to take on all the challenges that the city throws on them. How their
lives take a drastic turn post this, is what the film is all about.
Gharonda is more like a Shyam Benegal or a Govind Nihalani film
in its treatment. Emphasizing on the dark human desires and talking about
people going through their most troubled times, the movie is a dark and
pessimistic take on human emotions and their worth (or worthlessness) in a big
modern city like Bombay. Amol Palekar and Zarina Wahab play office colleagues
who fall in love and decide to marry. But before taking the marital plunge,
they decide to own a flat of their own for which Amol is forced to take a loan.
But in a rather cruel twist of fate, the builder with whom they book a flat
turns out to be a swindler. Not able to accept this big monetary loss, Amol’s
room-mate, who had also booked a flat with the same builder, commits suicide. Amol
completely breaks down but not before making an indecent proposal to Zarina
that literally breaks her heart. Accepting defeat at the hands of the heartless
society, Amol asks Zarina to marry their elderly boss (Shreeram Lagoo) who had
shown interest in her on more than once occasion. He tells her that their boss
couldn’t be expected to live for more than a few months at best, and after his
death they could get together again and live comfortably off the old man’s
wealth. Outraged at this suggestion, Zarina breaks all ties with him. But owing
to her unstable financial condition and her wish to fulfill her younger brother’s ambitions of
studying abroad, she decides to honor her boss’s proposal to her and marries
him. However, she accepts her husband wholeheartedly and makes all the efforts
to have him hale and hearty again. Meanwhile, devastated by this betrayal, Amol
loses all interest in life and becomes a recluse…
There are a lot of elements in this film that are
unconventional. Amol is shown to be living in a shady men’s hostel where one of
room-mates has regular tete-e-tete with prostitutes. Even Amol brings Zarina to
his room for the first time with not so noble intentions. The old man’s pursuit
of a young Zarina (almost his daughter’s age) is again not something which is regular.
Amol’s dissonance with the world and his complete disregard for his own self
post Zarina’s marriage, again is something which is not worthy of a Hindi movie
hero. He becomes an urban version of Devdas, and there is also a mention of his
involvement with prostitutes. Zarina’s comfort level with her much senior
husband is again dramatic, and quite uncomfortable. She becomes his trophy wife
without any complaints and accepts him with all his deficiencies. More than a
wife, she becomes his nurse, his householder, and his closest friend. Thus all
the characters in the story have shades of grey, which is truly unique for a
movie of its time and age.
The songs of the film are quite unlike the rest of the
narrative. They are given an easy treatment and are sans any dramatic or
visceral connotations. In fact if seen in isolation, they would give a
completely different impression about the movie. ‘Do Deewane Sheher Mein’ is the memorable song from the album, one
for which Gulzar won many accolades. As far as the performances go, Amol
Palekar attempts a completely different role and although he does well, it is
difficult to accept him this pessimistic and discontent avatar. Zarina Wahab
too is not very convincing in the complex role and it easy to see why she didn’t
become a very popular actress of that time. A Shabana Azmi instead of her could
have added a completely different texture to the performance with her penchant
for such complicated characters. Similarly a Shreeram Lagoo hasn’t got that
imposing aura that his character needed. One feels that a Sanjeev Kumar or an
Amjad Khan could have taken the film to an altogether different level.
Parting Note: Gharonda is a semi-Shyam Benegal
film with a Rajshri cast- It has a powerful narrative that could have been well
served by likes of Naseeruddin Shah, Sanjeev Kumar, and Shabana Azmi. The film
tells a novel story and is given a realistic treatment. However because of its
weak casting it fails to create a great impact and ends up being good film, but
hardly a must watch one.
I saw this way back when I was a kid, and (naturally enough, considering I was used to pure masala entertainment!) didn't like it - except for Do deewane shahar mein. From your review, I can see it may not be worth the effort of finding and rewatching, either.
ReplyDeleteYeah don't bother with this one for now, I am sure you would be having much better films lined up in your watch-list.
DeleteIt is not that bad a film because of mediocre acting. Sreeram Lagoo is fine, I agree Amol is inadequate but he's always been an inadequate actor in non-comic roles. Zarina, however, I differ on. I don't think Shabana Azmi is a wonderful actor, she had her moments of gold in a film like Pestonji, but she's given to some mourning and quiet/sulky roles, which isn't exactly what the director may have wanted an 18/19 year old confused woman to do. Zarina is adequate for the role (why she never made it as a big actor notwithstanding), she isn't supposed to display maturity or very complex emotions; she is a teenager who has a confused notion of duty, towards her new husband and towards her family (brothers/sister-in-law), and is looking for a rooted existence somehow. She had hoped to find an anchor in Amol Palekar, but she found his love wavering between the vulgar and the kind, and at odds with her wish to do well for her family. In portraying all this, I think Zarina's done a decent job. There could have been a better actor perhaps, but definitely not Shabana.
ReplyDeleteThe movie, in my opinion, falls short of being great too, I think that is mostly because of poor editing and some confused direction. The characters are never clearly delineated, Zarina is somewhat, but the rest are just shown extremely haphazard. What drives Zarina's younger brother and sister-in-law to change their mind once, and then change it again, and play along with her decision is unclear. They aren't shown to be particularly needy or wanting Lagoo's favours either. The appearance of a pimp in the men's hostel is also somewhat contrived, and lacking any point. I think it may be some bad editing work that killed the film. And I agree that the music of the film is something else, it moves you far more than the film itself. Still, the film has some boldness as you point out and was way ahead of its times.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. A succinct analysis, and I take your point that the lack of a coherent tone/treatment may be a result of inappropriate editing and confused direction, instead of just bad casting. And like you said, the film is definitely bold and ahead of its times... I wish it could have a more fulfilling watch.
DeleteA haunting movie. This blog is very interesting and informative.
ReplyDeleteThank you Annasabu for your comment and appreciation
ReplyDeleteA very nice movie and I like all songs.
ReplyDelete